Sprint Review Job Trends in Portsmouth

Sprint Reviews
Hampshire > Portsmouth

The table below provides summary statistics and salary benchmarking for jobs advertised in Portsmouth requiring Sprint Review skills. It covers permanent job vacancies from the 6 months leading up to 14 January 2026, with comparisons to the same periods in the previous two years.

6 months to
14 Jan 2026
Same period 2025 Same period 2024
Rank - - 41
Rank change year-on-year - - -
Permanent jobs citing Sprint Review 0 0 2
As % of all permanent jobs in Portsmouth - - 0.79%
As % of the Processes & Methodologies category - - 0.97%
Number of salaries quoted 0 0 1
Median annual salary (50th Percentile) - - £50,000
Hampshire median annual salary - £80,000 £50,000
% change year-on-year - +60.00% -

All Process & Methodology Skills
Portsmouth

Sprint Review falls under the Processes and Methodologies category. For comparison with the information above, the following table provides summary statistics for all permanent job vacancies requiring process or methodology skills in Portsmouth.

Permanent vacancies with a requirement for process or methodology skills 294 261 207
As % of all permanent jobs advertised in Portsmouth 90.74% 88.47% 81.50%
Number of salaries quoted 186 155 159
10th Percentile £27,750 £30,000 £36,000
25th Percentile £32,500 £36,250 £42,500
Median annual salary (50th Percentile) £46,499 £51,645 £55,000
Median % change year-on-year -9.96% -6.10% +4.76%
75th Percentile £65,000 £65,000 £68,750
90th Percentile £78,500 £78,250 £78,750
Hampshire median annual salary £50,000 £57,500 £52,000
% change year-on-year -13.04% +10.58% -5.45%

Sprint Review
Job Vacancy Trend in Portsmouth

Historical trend showing the proportion of permanent IT job postings citing Sprint Review relative to all permanent IT jobs advertised in Portsmouth.

Sprint Review job vacancy trend in Portsmouth

Sprint Review
Salary Trend in Portsmouth

Salary distribution trend for jobs in Portsmouth citing Sprint Review.

Salary distribution trend for jobs in Portsmouth citing Sprint Review