NeoLoad Contract Job Trends in Reading

Neotys NeoLoad
Berkshire > Reading

The table below provides summary statistics and contractor rates for jobs advertised in Reading requiring NeoLoad skills. It covers contract job vacancies from the 6 months leading up to 27 June 2026, with comparisons to the same periods in the previous two years.

6 months to
27 Jun 2026
Same period 2025 Same period 2024
Rank 89 - -
Rank change year-on-year - - -
Contract jobs citing NeoLoad 2 0 0
As % of all contract jobs in Reading 0.19% - -
As % of the Development Applications category 2.60% - -
Number of daily rates quoted 0 0 0
Median daily rate (50th Percentile) - - -
Berkshire median daily rate £375 - -

All Development Application Skills
Reading

NeoLoad falls under the Development Applications category. For comparison with the information above, the following table provides summary statistics for all contract job vacancies requiring development application skills in Reading.

Contract vacancies with a requirement for development application skills 77 66 154
As % of all contract IT jobs advertised in Reading 7.20% 12.20% 12.62%
Number of daily rates quoted 23 34 101
10th Percentile £83 £375 £413
25th Percentile £284 £470 £506
Median daily rate (50th Percentile) £518 £502 £613
Median % change year-on-year +3.14% -18.08% +11.36%
75th Percentile £575 £588 £650
90th Percentile £618 £630 £688
Berkshire median daily rate £425 £500 £575
% change year-on-year -15.00% -13.04% +9.52%
Number of hourly rates quoted 32 0 1
10th Percentile £81.79 - -
25th Percentile £83.00 - -
Median hourly rate £88.00 - £100.00
Median % change year-on-year - - +42.86%
75th Percentile - - -
90th Percentile - - -
Berkshire median hourly rate £88.00 £66.75 £78.00
% change year-on-year +31.84% -14.42% +11.43%

NeoLoad
Job Vacancy Trend in Reading

Historical trend showing the proportion of contract IT job postings citing NeoLoad relative to all contract IT jobs advertised in Reading.

NeoLoad job vacancy trend in Reading

NeoLoad
Co-Occurring Skills & Capabilities in Reading by Category

The following tables expand on the one above by listing co-occurrences grouped by category. They cover the same employment type, locality and period, with up to 20 co-occurrences shown in each category:

Cloud Services
1 2 (100.00%) Azure
1 2 (100.00%) Azure Monitor
Development Applications
1 2 (100.00%) JMeter
1 2 (100.00%) LoadRunner
General
1 2 (100.00%) Billing
Job Titles
1 2 (100.00%) Performance Tester
1 2 (100.00%) Tester
2 1 (50.00%) Lead
2 1 (50.00%) Lead Tester
2 1 (50.00%) Performance Test Leader
2 1 (50.00%) Test Leader
Processes & Methodologies
1 2 (100.00%) Agile
1 2 (100.00%) DevOps
1 2 (100.00%) Non-Functional Testing
1 2 (100.00%) Performance Engineering
1 2 (100.00%) Performance Testing
1 2 (100.00%) Test Scripting
1 2 (100.00%) Test Strategy
1 2 (100.00%) Volume Testing
2 1 (50.00%) Acceptance Criteria
2 1 (50.00%) Actionable Insight
2 1 (50.00%) CI/CD
2 1 (50.00%) Mentoring
2 1 (50.00%) Performance Monitoring
2 1 (50.00%) Roadmaps
2 1 (50.00%) Root Cause Analysis
2 1 (50.00%) Stakeholder Engagement
2 1 (50.00%) Stakeholder Management
2 1 (50.00%) Strategic Roadmap
2 1 (50.00%) Validation
Vendors
1 2 (100.00%) AppDynamics
1 2 (100.00%) Dynatrace